Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Some Old Globular Clusters (and Stars) Inferring That the Universe Is Older Than Commonly Accepted

Received: 24 February 2024     Accepted: 27 March 2024     Published: 11 April 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has made startling discoveries regarding the early universe. It has revealed galaxies as soon as 300 million years after the Big Bang, challenging current galaxy formation models. Additionally, it has identified massive, bright galaxies in the young universe, contradicting the standard ΛCDM model's age estimate of 13.8 Gyr. This prompts a re-evaluation of galaxy formation and cosmological models. There is a strong tension between JWST high-redshift galaxy observations and Planck Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) satellite measurements. Even alternative cosmological models, including those incorporating dark matter–baryon interaction, f(R) gravity, and dynamical dark have failed to resolve this tension. One possible solution is that the Universe's age exceeds predictions by the ΛCDM model. The study challenges this by introducing a method based on blue straggler stars (BSs) within GCs, comparing ages with other models. The ages obtained are compared with those of other models to certify that they are equally valid. These values are comparable within the error ranges except for the clusters: NGC104, NGC 5634, IC 4499, NGC 6273 and NGC 4833, finding their respective ages to be between 14.7 and 21.6 Gyr, surpassing the commonly accepted age of the Universe. These results inferred an age for the Universe of around 26 Gyr, close to 26.7 Gyr. This value aligns that suggested by the cosmological model named Covarying Coupling Constants + TL (CCC+TL). Such a value is consistent with early universe observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). The results of the present paper reinforces the advocating for a critical review of models encompassing dark mass, dark energy, and the dynamics of the Universe, particularly in explaining the presence of primitive massive galaxies, very old GCs, and very old and poor metallic stars.

Published in American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (Volume 11, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaa.20241101.11
Page(s) 1-13
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Galactic Structure, Globular Clusters, Cosmological Parameters

References
[1] Cowan, J. J., Christopher, S., Scott, B., et al. The Chemical Composition and Age of the Metal-poor Halo Star BD +17°3248. The Astrophysical Journal. 2002, 572, (2), 861-879.
[2] Cayrel, R., Hill, V., Beers, T. C., Barbuy, B., et al. Measurement of stellar age from uranium decay. Nature. 2001, 409, (6821), 691-692.
[3] Hansen, B. M. S., Anderson, J., Brewer, J., et al. The White Dwarf Cooling Sequence of NGC 6397. The Astrophysical Journal. 2007, 671(1), 380-401.
[4] Gratton, R. G., Bragaglia, A.,. Carretta, E, et al. Distances and ages of NGC 6397, NGC 6752 and 47 Tuc. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2003, 408(2), 529-543.
[5] Florentino, F., Massaria, D., McConnachiec, A., et al, Stellar photometry with Multi Conjugate Adaptive Optics. arXiv: 1608.01457v1. 2016.
[6] Bono, G.; Stetson, P. B.; VandenBerg, D. A, et al. On a new near-infrared method to estimate the absolute ages of star clusters: NGC 3201 as a first test case. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 2010. 708(2), L4.
[7] Massari, D.; Fiorentino, G.; McConnachie, A. et al. GeMS MCAO observations of the Galactic globular cluster NGC 2808: the absolute age. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2016, 586, A51
[8] Correnti et al (2016) Correnti, M., Gennaro, M., Kalirai, J. S.; Brown, T. M. et al. Constraining globular cluster age uncertainties using the IR colour–magnitude diagram. The Astrophysical Journal, 2016, 823, (1), 17p.
[9] Gupta, R. P. JWST early Universe observations and ΛCDM cosmology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2023, 524(3), 3385–3395
[10] Wang, D. & Liu, Y. JWST high redshift galaxy observations have a strong tension with Planck CMB measurements. arXiv: 2301.00347v2. 2023.
[11] Santini, P., Menci, N., & Castellano, M. Constraints on dark energy from the abundance of massive galaxies. arXiv: 2301.03892. 2023.
[12] Steinhardt, C. L., Sneppen, A., Clausen, T., et al. 2023, The Highest-Redshift Balmer Breaks as a Test of ΛCDM. arXiv: 2305.15459v1. 2023.
[13] Bolte, M. and Hogan, C. J. Conflict over the age of the Universe. Nature, 1995, 376, 399-402.
[14] Tang, J. and Joyce, M. Revised Best Estimates for the Age and Mass of the Methuselah Star HD 140283 Using MESA and Interferometry and Implications for 1D Convection. Research Notes of the AAS, 2021, 5(3), 117.
[15] Plotnikova, A., Carraro, G., Villanova, S., and Ortolani, S Very Metal-poor Stars in the Solar Vicinity: Age Determination. The Astrophysical Journal. 2022, 940(2), 159.
[16] Jeffries, R. D., Jackson, R. J., and Binks, A. S. A revised age greater than 50 Myr for the young cluster IC 4665. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2023, 526(1), 1260-1267.
[17] Cimatti, A. and Moresco, M. Revisiting the Oldest Stars as Cosmological Probes: New Constraints on the Hubble Constant. The Astrophysical Journal. 2023, 953(2), 149.
[18] Llorente de Andrés, F. and Morales-Durán, C. A Model of the Dynamics of Open Clusters: Time-Scales, Core Collapse and Blue Stragglers. American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2022. 9(4), 52-66.
[19] Valls-Gabaud, D. Stellar ages and their cosmological context. European Astronomical Society Publications Series. 2014, 65, 5–15.
[20] Bailin, J. Globular Cluster Intrinsic Iron Abundance Spreads. I. Catalog. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 2019, 245(1), 5.
[21] Moretti, A., de Angeli, F., & Piotto, G. Catalogue of Blue Stragglers. VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2008, J/A+A/483/183.
[22] Harris, W. E. A New Catalog of Globular Clusters in the Milky Way. Astronomical Journal. 1996, 112, 1487 (Edition 2010)
[23] Recio-Blanco, A., Aparicio, A., Piotto, G., De Angeli, F. and Djorgovski, S. G. Multivariate analysis of globular cluster horizontal branch morphology: searching for the second parameter. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2006, 452(3), 875-884
[24] Kraus, L. M. and Chaboyer, B. Age Estimates of Globular Clusters in the Milky Way: Constraints on Cosmology. SCIENCE. 2003, 299, Issue 5603, 65-69
[25] Leigh, N., Sills, A. and Knigge, C. Where the Blue Stragglers Roam: Searching for a Link between Formation and Environment. The Astrophysical Journal. 2007, 661(1), 210 – 221.
[26] Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B. and Dalessandro, E. The “dynamical clock”: dating the internal dynamical evolution of star clusters with Blue Straggler Stars. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali. 2020, 31, 19–31
[27] Valcin, D., Jimenez, R., Verde, L., Bernal, J. L. and Wandelt, B. D. Inferring the age of the universe with globular clusters. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2021, Volume 2020, December 2020.
[28] Usher, C., Beckwith, T., Bellstedt, S., et al. The WAGGS project – II. The reliability of the calcium triplet as a metallicity indicator in integrated stellar light. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2018, 482(1), 1275-1303. VizieR Online Data Catalog: WAGGS Globular Cluster Ca Triplet Metallicities (Usher+, 2019). J/MNRAS/482/1275/table1
[29] Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. MESA isochrones and stellar tracks (MIST). I. solar-scaled models. The Astrophysical Journal. 2016. 823(2), 102-150.
[30] Kızıltan, B., Baumgardt, H. and Loeb, A. An intermediate-mass black hole in the centre of the globular cluster 47 Tucanae. Nature. 2017.542, 203-205. Corrig. 03 May 2017.
[31] Ke Qin, Long Jiang and Wen-Cong Che. Black Hole Ultracompact X-Ray Binaries: Galactic Low-frequency Gravitational Wave Sources. The Astrophysical Journal. 2023, 944 (1), 83.
[32] Ke Qin, Kun Xu, Dong-Dong Liu, Long Jiang, Bo Wang and Wen-Cong Chen. Black Hole Ultracompact X-Ray Binaries as Galactic Low-frequency Gravitational Wave Sources: The He Star Channel. The Astrophysical Journal. 2024, 961 (1), 110.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Llorente de Andrés, F. (2024). Some Old Globular Clusters (and Stars) Inferring That the Universe Is Older Than Commonly Accepted. American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 11(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20241101.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Llorente de Andrés, F. Some Old Globular Clusters (and Stars) Inferring That the Universe Is Older Than Commonly Accepted. Am. J. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 11(1), 1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20241101.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Llorente de Andrés F. Some Old Globular Clusters (and Stars) Inferring That the Universe Is Older Than Commonly Accepted. Am J Astron Astrophys. 2024;11(1):1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20241101.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaa.20241101.11,
      author = {Félix Llorente de Andrés},
      title = {Some Old Globular Clusters (and Stars) Inferring That the Universe Is Older Than Commonly Accepted
    },
      journal = {American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics},
      volume = {11},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-13},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaa.20241101.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20241101.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaa.20241101.11},
      abstract = {The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has made startling discoveries regarding the early universe. It has revealed galaxies as soon as 300 million years after the Big Bang, challenging current galaxy formation models. Additionally, it has identified massive, bright galaxies in the young universe, contradicting the standard ΛCDM model's age estimate of 13.8 Gyr. This prompts a re-evaluation of galaxy formation and cosmological models. There is a strong tension between JWST high-redshift galaxy observations and Planck Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) satellite measurements. Even alternative cosmological models, including those incorporating dark matter–baryon interaction, f(R) gravity, and dynamical dark have failed to resolve this tension. One possible solution is that the Universe's age exceeds predictions by the ΛCDM model. The study challenges this by introducing a method based on blue straggler stars (BSs) within GCs, comparing ages with other models. The ages obtained are compared with those of other models to certify that they are equally valid. These values are comparable within the error ranges except for the clusters: NGC104, NGC 5634, IC 4499, NGC 6273 and NGC 4833, finding their respective ages to be between 14.7 and 21.6 Gyr, surpassing the commonly accepted age of the Universe. These results inferred an age for the Universe of around 26 Gyr, close to 26.7 Gyr. This value aligns that suggested by the cosmological model named Covarying Coupling Constants + TL (CCC+TL). Such a value is consistent with early universe observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). The results of the present paper reinforces the advocating for a critical review of models encompassing dark mass, dark energy, and the dynamics of the Universe, particularly in explaining the presence of primitive massive galaxies, very old GCs, and very old and poor metallic stars.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Some Old Globular Clusters (and Stars) Inferring That the Universe Is Older Than Commonly Accepted
    
    AU  - Félix Llorente de Andrés
    Y1  - 2024/04/11
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20241101.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaa.20241101.11
    T2  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    JF  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    JO  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 13
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-4686
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20241101.11
    AB  - The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has made startling discoveries regarding the early universe. It has revealed galaxies as soon as 300 million years after the Big Bang, challenging current galaxy formation models. Additionally, it has identified massive, bright galaxies in the young universe, contradicting the standard ΛCDM model's age estimate of 13.8 Gyr. This prompts a re-evaluation of galaxy formation and cosmological models. There is a strong tension between JWST high-redshift galaxy observations and Planck Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) satellite measurements. Even alternative cosmological models, including those incorporating dark matter–baryon interaction, f(R) gravity, and dynamical dark have failed to resolve this tension. One possible solution is that the Universe's age exceeds predictions by the ΛCDM model. The study challenges this by introducing a method based on blue straggler stars (BSs) within GCs, comparing ages with other models. The ages obtained are compared with those of other models to certify that they are equally valid. These values are comparable within the error ranges except for the clusters: NGC104, NGC 5634, IC 4499, NGC 6273 and NGC 4833, finding their respective ages to be between 14.7 and 21.6 Gyr, surpassing the commonly accepted age of the Universe. These results inferred an age for the Universe of around 26 Gyr, close to 26.7 Gyr. This value aligns that suggested by the cosmological model named Covarying Coupling Constants + TL (CCC+TL). Such a value is consistent with early universe observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). The results of the present paper reinforces the advocating for a critical review of models encompassing dark mass, dark energy, and the dynamics of the Universe, particularly in explaining the presence of primitive massive galaxies, very old GCs, and very old and poor metallic stars.
    
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Astrophysics, Center of Astrobiology (CAB) - European Space Astronomy Center (ESAC) Campus, Villanueva de la Cañada (Madrid), Spain; Section of Science and Technology, Almagro Athenaeum, Almagro (Ciudad Real), Spain

  • Sections