Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

The Contribution of Host Galaxy Properties in X-Ray Active Galactic Nuclei Clusters

Received: 22 May 2024     Accepted: 14 June 2024     Published: 29 June 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In this study, the influence of host galaxy properties on X-ray active galactic nuclei (AGN) clusters was investigated using multiwavelength data. X-ray data from the eFEDS main catalog, optical and near-infrared data from the fourth data release of KiDS/VIKING, and mid-infrared data from WISE were utilized. By integrating these datasets and employing the CIGALE code, the star formation rate, luminosity, and stellar mass of the host galaxies were estimated. The analysis reveals significant associations between luminosity, stellar mass, and star formation rate, providing valuable insights into AGN activity. Furthermore, AGN clusters were compared with non-AGN clusters to uncover distinctive characteristics. AGN clusters exhibit differences in their population across various luminosity levels. Interestingly, a significant proportion of AGN clusters is concentrated in the middle range of luminosity (45-46 measured in logL(0.5-2.0 keV)) for both low and high redshift classifications. Additionally, galaxies hosting AGNs detected in X-ray emission tend to fall within a specific range of stellar mass (10-11 measured in log(M(M)). This stellar mass range is populated by a substantial number of AGN galaxies, irrespective of their redshift classification. Moreover, a significant population of X-ray AGN is concentrated within the star formation rate range of 1.5-2.5 (expressed in log(M yr-1)) in both low and high redshift regions. By analyzing the dependencies on luminosity, stellar mass, and star formation rate, this study provides valuable insights into the correlation and relationship between AGN clusters and their host galaxies. The comparison with non-AGN clusters and the integration of multiwavelength data from eFEDS, KiDS/VIKING, and WISE enhance the depth of analysis, contributing to a comprehensive evaluation of AGN clusters. These findings advance our understanding of the complex relationship between AGN clusters and host galaxy properties in the field of astrophysics.

Published in American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (Volume 11, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.11
Page(s) 33-50
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN), Host Galaxy Properties, Star Formation

References
[1] E. Pouliasis et al., “XXL-HSC: An updated catalogue of high-redshift (z3.5) X-ray AGN in the XMM-XXL northern field: Constraints on the bright end of the soft log N -log S,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 658, 2022,
[2] E. A. Fath, Fath, and E. Arthur, “The spectra of some spiral nebulae and globular star clusters,” LicOB, vol. 149, no. 2064, pp. 71–77, 1909,
[3] V. M. Slipher, Slipher, and V. M., “The spectrum and velocity of the nebula N.G.C. 1068 ( M 77),” LowOB, vol. 3, pp. 59–62, 1917, Accessed: Nov. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available:
[4] H. D. Curtis, Curtis, and H. D., “Descriptions of 762 Nebulae and Clusters Photographed with the Crossley Reflector,” PLicO, vol. 13, pp. 9–42, 1918, Accessed: Nov. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available:
[5] D. O. Edge et al., “A survey of radio sources at a frequency of 159 Mc/s.,” MmRAS, vol. 68, pp. 37–60, 1959, Accessed: Nov. 29, 2022. [Online]. Available:
[6] N. Kamraj, “Probing the Corona in Active Galactic Nuclei Using Broadband X-ray Spectroscopy Thesis by,” no. September 2021, 2022.
[7] V. Beckmann et al., “Hard X-ray Variability of AGN,” 2007.
[8] C. S. Bowyer, A. Michael Lampton, and J. Mack, “DETECTION OF X-RAY EMISSION FROM 3C 273 AND NGC 5128,” Astrophys. J., 1970.
[9] R. Giacconi et al., “THE THIRD UHURU CATALOG OF X-RAY SOURCES,” Am. Astron. Soc., 1974.
[10] I. Delvecchio et al., “Tracing the cosmic growth of supermassive black holes to z ~3 with Herschel,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., vol. 439, no. 3, pp. 2736–2754, 2014,
[11] C. Schreiber et al., “The Herschel view of the dominant mode of galaxy growth from z = 4 to the present day,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 575, pp. 1–29, 2015,
[12] L. Koutoulidis, G. Mountrichas, I. Georgantopoulos, E. Pouliasis, and M. Plionis, “Host galaxy properties of X-ray active galactic nuclei in the local Universe,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 658, no. 42466, pp. 2–9, 2022,
[13] D. Merritt and L. Ferrarese, “ The M • –σ Relation for Supermassive Black Holes,” Astrophys. J., vol. 547, no. 1, pp. 140–145, 2001,
[14] G. Yang et al., “Evident black hole-bulge coevolution in the distant universe,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., vol. 485, no. 3, pp. 3721–3737, 2019,
[15] F. Zou, G. Yang, W. N. Brandt, and Y. Xue, “The Host-galaxy Properties of Type 1 versus Type 2 Active Galactic Nuclei,” Astrophys. J., vol. 878, no. 1, p. 11, 2019,
[16] A. L. Coil et al., “Aegis: The clustering of x-ray active galactic nucleus relative to galaxies at z 1,” Astrophys. J., vol. 701, no. 2, pp. 1484–1499, 2009,
[17] G. Mountrichas, A. Georgakakis, and I. Georgantopoulos, “The dependence of the X-ray AGN clustering on the properties of the host galaxy,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., vol. 483, no. 1, pp. 1374–1387, 2019,
[18] M. Salvato et al., “The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): Identification and characterization of the counterparts to point-like sources,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 661, pp. 1–32, 2022,
[19] P. Predehl et al., “The eROSITA X-ray telescope on SRG,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 647, 2021,
[20] H. Brunner et al., “The eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey (eFEDS): X-ray catalogue,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 661, 2022,
[21] ESO, “New data from the Kilo-Degree Survey: KiDS Data Release 4,” ESO - News and Changes, 2019.
[22] K. Kuijken et al., “The fourth data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey: Ugri imaging and nine-band optical-IR photometry over 1000 square degrees,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 625, no. October 2011, pp. 1–25, 2019,
[23] E. Pouliasis, G. Mountrichas, I. Georgantopoulos, A. Ruiz, M. Yang, and A. Z. Bonanos, “An obscured AGN population hidden in the VIPERS galaxies: Identification through spectral energy distribution decomposition,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., vol. 495, no. 2, pp. 1853–1873, 2020,
[24] E. L. Wright et al., “The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (wise): Mission description and initial on-orbit performance,” Astron. J., vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1868–1881, 2010,
[25] G. Yang et al., “X - CIGALE : fitting AGN / galaxy SEDs from X-ray to infrared 1 I N T RO D U C T I O N,” vol. 757, pp. 740–757, 2020,
[26] J. Comparat et al., “Active galactic nuclei and their large-scale structure: An eROSITA mock catalogue,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 2005–2029, 2019,
[27] A. Liu et al., “The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): Catalog of galaxy clusters and groups,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 661, 2022,
[28] G. Mountrichas et al., “Comparison of the star formation of X-ray selected active galactic nuclei in eFEDS with star-forming galaxies,” pp. 1–14, 2022, [Online]. Available:
[29] M. Boquien et al., “CIGALE: A python Code Investigating GALaxy Emission,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 622, 2019,
[30] G. Mountrichas et al., “Comparison of star formation histories of AGN and non-AGN galaxies,” Astron. Astrophys., no. 2018, 2022,
[31] G. Yang et al., “Fitting AGN/Galaxy X-Ray-to-radio SEDs with CIGALE and Improvement of the Code,” Astrophys. J., vol. 927, no. 2, p. 192, 2022,
[32] B. Carroll and D. A. Ostlie, Introduction To Modern Astrophysics. 2014.
[33] G. Mountrichas, V. A. Masoura, E. M. Xilouris, I. Georgantopoulos, V. Buat, and E. D. Paspaliaris, “Star formation of X-ray AGN in COSMOS: The role of AGN activity and galaxy stellar mass,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 661, 2022,
[34] M. Stalevski, C. Ricci, Y. Ueda, P. Lira, J. Fritz, and M. Baes, “The dust covering factor in active galactic nuclei,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., vol. 458, no. 3, pp. 2288–2302, 2016,
[35] E. Pouliasis et al., “XXL-HSC: Link between AGN activity and star formation in the early Universe (z ≥ 3.5),” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 667, pp. 1–19, 2022,
[36] G. Mountrichas, V. Buat, G. Yang, M. Boquien, D. Burgarella, and L. Ciesla, “X-ray flux in SED modelling: An application of X-CIGALE in the XMM-XXL field,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 646, pp. 1–17, 2021,
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mekonen, G., Kare, A. (2024). The Contribution of Host Galaxy Properties in X-Ray Active Galactic Nuclei Clusters. American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 11(2), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mekonen, G.; Kare, A. The Contribution of Host Galaxy Properties in X-Ray Active Galactic Nuclei Clusters. Am. J. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 11(2), 33-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mekonen G, Kare A. The Contribution of Host Galaxy Properties in X-Ray Active Galactic Nuclei Clusters. Am J Astron Astrophys. 2024;11(2):33-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.11,
      author = {Gutu Mekonen and Anno Kare},
      title = {The Contribution of Host Galaxy Properties in X-Ray Active Galactic Nuclei Clusters
    },
      journal = {American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics},
      volume = {11},
      number = {2},
      pages = {33-50},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaa.20241102.11},
      abstract = {In this study, the influence of host galaxy properties on X-ray active galactic nuclei (AGN) clusters was investigated using multiwavelength data. X-ray data from the eFEDS main catalog, optical and near-infrared data from the fourth data release of KiDS/VIKING, and mid-infrared data from WISE were utilized. By integrating these datasets and employing the CIGALE code, the star formation rate, luminosity, and stellar mass of the host galaxies were estimated. The analysis reveals significant associations between luminosity, stellar mass, and star formation rate, providing valuable insights into AGN activity. Furthermore, AGN clusters were compared with non-AGN clusters to uncover distinctive characteristics. AGN clusters exhibit differences in their population across various luminosity levels. Interestingly, a significant proportion of AGN clusters is concentrated in the middle range of luminosity (45-46 measured in logL(0.5-2.0 keV)) for both low and high redshift classifications. Additionally, galaxies hosting AGNs detected in X-ray emission tend to fall within a specific range of stellar mass (10-11 measured in log(M⋆(M⊚)). This stellar mass range is populated by a substantial number of AGN galaxies, irrespective of their redshift classification. Moreover, a significant population of X-ray AGN is concentrated within the star formation rate range of 1.5-2.5 (expressed in log(M⊚ yr-1)) in both low and high redshift regions. By analyzing the dependencies on luminosity, stellar mass, and star formation rate, this study provides valuable insights into the correlation and relationship between AGN clusters and their host galaxies. The comparison with non-AGN clusters and the integration of multiwavelength data from eFEDS, KiDS/VIKING, and WISE enhance the depth of analysis, contributing to a comprehensive evaluation of AGN clusters. These findings advance our understanding of the complex relationship between AGN clusters and host galaxy properties in the field of astrophysics.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Contribution of Host Galaxy Properties in X-Ray Active Galactic Nuclei Clusters
    
    AU  - Gutu Mekonen
    AU  - Anno Kare
    Y1  - 2024/06/29
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.11
    T2  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    JF  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    JO  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    SP  - 33
    EP  - 50
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-4686
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20241102.11
    AB  - In this study, the influence of host galaxy properties on X-ray active galactic nuclei (AGN) clusters was investigated using multiwavelength data. X-ray data from the eFEDS main catalog, optical and near-infrared data from the fourth data release of KiDS/VIKING, and mid-infrared data from WISE were utilized. By integrating these datasets and employing the CIGALE code, the star formation rate, luminosity, and stellar mass of the host galaxies were estimated. The analysis reveals significant associations between luminosity, stellar mass, and star formation rate, providing valuable insights into AGN activity. Furthermore, AGN clusters were compared with non-AGN clusters to uncover distinctive characteristics. AGN clusters exhibit differences in their population across various luminosity levels. Interestingly, a significant proportion of AGN clusters is concentrated in the middle range of luminosity (45-46 measured in logL(0.5-2.0 keV)) for both low and high redshift classifications. Additionally, galaxies hosting AGNs detected in X-ray emission tend to fall within a specific range of stellar mass (10-11 measured in log(M⋆(M⊚)). This stellar mass range is populated by a substantial number of AGN galaxies, irrespective of their redshift classification. Moreover, a significant population of X-ray AGN is concentrated within the star formation rate range of 1.5-2.5 (expressed in log(M⊚ yr-1)) in both low and high redshift regions. By analyzing the dependencies on luminosity, stellar mass, and star formation rate, this study provides valuable insights into the correlation and relationship between AGN clusters and their host galaxies. The comparison with non-AGN clusters and the integration of multiwavelength data from eFEDS, KiDS/VIKING, and WISE enhance the depth of analysis, contributing to a comprehensive evaluation of AGN clusters. These findings advance our understanding of the complex relationship between AGN clusters and host galaxy properties in the field of astrophysics.
    
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections